Blogs

2 min read

Jira Service Desk: Accelerator vs. Custom Implementation

Jul 23, 2018 11:00:00 AM

Once organizations make the decision to adopt Jira Service Desk, they often choose one of two implementation options: they either do it themselves or engage a consultancy for a custom implementation—neither of which is ideal for any but the largest enterprises. Few organizations have the skillsets to do the work in-house, and a custom implementation can be both pricey and time-consuming. Fortunately, there’s a third option: An Accelerator implementation by Praecipio Consulting.

There are distinct differences between a traditional Jira Service Desk implementation and an Accelerator implementation by Praecipio Consulting. To choose the best implementation method for your organization, it’s important to understand how the options differ as well as your organization’s requirements.

Let’s look first at a traditional implementation. Because of the scope of a Jira Service Desk implementation, an experienced consulting firm will work iteratively to ensure your satisfaction throughout the process. The consultant(s) will meet with your stakeholders daily to gather requirements and demonstrate the previous day’s deliverables. With the right consulting firm, this process will result in a top-notch Jira Service Desk deployment that meets your exact needs. However, the deployment will take several months.

A traditional implementation is ideal if your organization requires:

  • Multiple, complex workflows
  • Heavily customized workflows
  • Heavily customized interface
  • Flexibility

A Accelerator implementation is also performed in an iterative manner. However, the scope of the project is much smaller. Instead of building out complex custom workflows, the project provides prescribed configurations based on ITIL best practices. Our team applies its extensive experience to build out industry standard workflows with improvements that we’ve identified over the past decade. As a result, we deliver a Jira Service Desk implementation in just three weeks with workflows that are a step above the textbook recommendation.

A Quick Start implementation is ideal if your organization requires:

  • Rapid delivery
  • Basic workflows such as service request, change management, and incident management
  • Minimal time spent configuring using prescribed methods and schemes
  • Deployment based on industry best practices
  • A solid foundation for future growth and/or customization

The bottom line: A Quick Start implementation allows you to trade customization for speed of delivery and cost. Many small and mid-sized organizations make this trade willingly as they have little need for heavy customizations. If this sounds like you—or even if it doesn’t—our consultants would be happy to discuss our implementation options with you. Check out praecipio.com to learn more about our Quick Start options and other ITSM resources.

Webinars

Case Studies

Blog